Skip to content

Model Card|Wan3.0

Aug 26, 20261 min
TL;DRWan3.0: single-shot length doubles from Wan2.7's 15s to 30s, up to 1080P, supports doc/xls/ppt/pdf/md files and web pages as generation inputs, priced at 480P $0.05 / 720P $0.10 / 1080P $0.20 per second — roughly 50% cheaper than Google Veo 3.1 Standard, but now closed-source API-only, and not yet independently tested by third parties

🌏 中文版

Model Information

FieldValue
Model IDwan3.0-video
VendorAlibaba Cloud (Tongyi Wan team)
ParametersUndisclosed
Context WindowNot a text model — no context window concept; max single-shot generation is 30 seconds at up to 1080P/30fps
Input Pricing (USD/1M tokens)N/A (billed per generated second; see pricing below)
Output Pricing (USD/1M tokens)480P $0.05/sec, 720P $0.10/sec, 1080P $0.20/sec (a 30-sec 1080P video ≈ $6.00)
Open SourceNo (Wan 2.1/2.2 were open-sourced under Apache 2.0; Wan3.0 onward is API-only, closed-source)
Release Date2026-08-24 (public beta since 2026-08-06)
Official AnnouncementAlibaba Cloud Model Studio: Wan 3.0
HuggingFaceNone (closed-source, not listed)
FamilyWan 3.x (predecessor: Wan2.7, released 2026-04-03)

Key Capabilities

  • Single-shot generation length doubles from Wan2.7's 15 seconds to 30 seconds — one of the few mainstream video models that supports half-minute single-take narratives
  • New "Omni Reference": doc, xls, ppt, pdf, md files and web pages can all serve as generation inputs, converting tables, slides, and document content directly into video
  • Up to 10 reference images can simultaneously lock character, scene, and prop consistency, maintaining appearance and spatial relationships across multi-shot transitions
  • Native audio-visual synchronized generation with multilingual lip-sync (official demo shows a single character singing consecutively in 8 languages)

Benchmark Performance

ComparisonWan3.0Wan2.7 (predecessor)Strongest competitor (Google Veo 3.1 Standard)
Single-shot length30 sec15 secNo clear public limit (Veo 3.1 ≈ 8 sec per shot)
Max resolution1080P1080P1080P
1080P pricing (per second)$0.20Not listed per-second (billed per generation)$0.40
Document/web page inputSupported (doc/xls/ppt/pdf/md/web pages)Not supportedNot supported

⚠️ The generation length, consistency, and lip-sync quality claims above are all from Alibaba's official demos. No third-party independent testing or standardized benchmark scores exist yet; pricing figures are from official announcements.

Comparison with Predecessors and Competitors

Compared to Wan2.7, the biggest improvement is a straight doubling of generation length (15s → 30s), plus the new Omni Reference capability that lets any file type serve as input. Previously you could only feed images, video, and audio — now slides, spreadsheets, PDFs, and web pages can all become video script inputs. This is a meaningful product differentiation for marketing, education, and enterprise content production, rather than just parameter stacking.

Compared to Google Veo 3.1, Wan3.0 at $0.20 per second for 1080P is half the price of Veo 3.1 Standard's $0.40, a clear cost advantage. However, Veo 3.1 has more third-party testing and ecosystem integrations. Wan3.0 is currently only available through an application-based API preview and has not fully opened access — this has been repeatedly noted in coverage as a caveat that "quality claims remain to be verified."

A notable strategic shift: Wan 2.1/2.2 were among the few mainstream video models to open-source weights on Hugging Face/GitHub (Apache 2.0). From Wan 2.5 onward, the series has progressively moved to API-only, and Wan3.0 continues this closed-source trajectory. If you previously relied on Wan's open-source versions for self-hosted inference, Wan 2.2 is currently the last downloadable version — Wan3.0 is only available through the cloud API.

Implications for Agent Development

Omni Reference turns "document-to-video" into a single API call, directly impacting agents that build content automation pipelines. Previously you'd need a separate agent to summarize a PDF/slide deck into a text script before feeding it to a video model — now you can skip the intermediate summarization step and pass the raw document directly to Wan3.0.

  • If you're building marketing/educational content automation agents: you can design a single-step workflow of "upload slides → directly produce a 30-second short video," without maintaining a document-to-script middleware layer
  • If you're building multimodal content review or localization agents: the 30-second length plus multilingual lip-sync is suitable for batch-generating multiple language versions of the same video
  • Not suitable for: scenarios requiring offline/local deployment (Wan3.0 has no open-source weights, cloud API only), and production content requiring strict quality guarantees (quality claims are not yet third-party verified, and the API is still in application-based preview — stability and quotas remain to be seen)

Takeaway

I used to think the "video model arms race" would only push toward higher resolution and longer generation length. But Wan3.0's Omni Reference (accepting doc/xls/ppt/pdf/md as generation inputs) is a reminder that real product differentiation often lies in "how open the input interface is" rather than "how impressive the output specs are." It's also a reminder that open source is not a permanent vendor commitment — Wan went from Apache 2.0 at 2.1/2.2 all the way to fully API-only at 3.0, which means when evaluating models you can't just check "has this family ever been open source" — you need to look at the actual license terms of the latest version.

References