Skip to content
All tags

#crawl4ai

4 posts

Web Extraction Quality Benchmark: Crawl4AI, Firecrawl, Jina Reader, and Readability

Extraction tools cannot be compared by HTTP 200s. The same 20 URLs must be scored for body text, headings, tables, code, links, metadata, noise, latency, and cost. This article publishes the corpus, adapter contract, and gates, but no winner without a same-version raw run across all four paths.

ai guide

Crawl4AI Complete Guide: From Markdown Crawling to Structured Extraction

Crawl4AI handles retrieval after a URL is known: use JsonCssExtractionStrategy for stable DOMs, and switch to LLMExtractionStrategy only when extraction needs semantic judgment or must tolerate irregular layouts.

Build Your Own Search Backend: SearXNG + Crawl4AI, From Zero to Claude Code

Three components, one job each: SearXNG finds, Crawl4AI reads, and a thin layer of your own code glues them together. Three defaults will stop you cold — `formats` only emits HTML, `secret_key` ships as the literal string `ultrasecretkey`, and turning on the limiter blocks your own code. Also, the official install path changed in March 2026, so most tutorials online point at a repository that is now archived.

Tavily and Exa Can't Be Self-Hosted: How to Build Your Own

Tavily and Exa are cloud-only APIs and can't be self-hosted. What you can assemble instead is SearXNG (269 upstream engines, 82 on by default) plus Crawl4AI (78.8k stars, Apache-2.0), and the ready-made Tavily-compatible wrappers are all still double-digit-star solo projects you should not depend on. But SearXNG has no index of its own, and running it from a datacenter IP gets you empty results — those two facts decide whether self-hosting is worth it.