Nine coding agents have taken at least four different paths for long-term memory: Claude Code and Codex use Markdown files (agent-written, human-readable), Antigravity CLI inherits Gemini CLI's approval inbox (agent proposes, human decides), and Copilot uses citations with JIT verification (auto-deleted after 28 days unverified). Cursor removed its Memories feature and fell back to human-written Rules. Hermes Agent, OpenClaw, and Letta Code treat memory as a core harness component, not a plugin. Their choices on write timing, forgetting, and cross-team sharing are completely different — and none has published a controlled experiment on whether their memory system actually helps.
In August 2026, it's not just five frameworks moving. Beyond OMP 2, Pi v2, Opencode 2, dsh, and Claude Code, three model makers — Google (Antigravity CLI), Meta (Muse Code), and xAI (Grok Build) — are building coding agents directly. Add Amp, Cline 2.0, and the Codex CLI Rust rewrite, and eight-plus frameworks are undergoing architecture-level changes simultaneously. Factor in 110+ total CLI tools, and H2 2026 is a divergence period for harness methodology. This article analyzes four architectural approaches, one shared direction, and one emerging trust crisis.
Antigravity CLI is a terminal agent Google announced at I/O on May 19, 2026. Written in Go (versus Gemini CLI's Node.js), its binary is called agy, and it shares the same agent harness as the desktop Antigravity 2.0. It is also Gemini CLI's successor — the personal-tier Gemini CLI service ends on June 18, 2026.