Skip to content
All tags

#governance

10 posts

Carrying Content Moderation's Old Lessons into Generative AI | Harvard CS2881R Lecture 5

Lecture 5 of CS2881R brought in Ziad Reslan from OpenAI Product Policy to talk about content policies. The course site lists no lecture recording or slides, so outside readers get three pre-readings, a student-written LessWrong summary, and a 17-minute student experiment video. The thread through them: social platforms spent two decades learning that wherever you draw the line you create edge cases, yet you still have to draw it. Generative AI adds new problems: chat sits somewhere between a private document and a public post, and an image is easier to read as a stance than text is.

AI-Native SDLC Playbook L1: When Code Generation Is No Longer the Bottleneck

Claude Academy's opening lesson identifies the core paradox: AI accelerates code generation, but review, testing, and deployment don't keep pace. The bottleneck shifts from 'not writing fast enough' to 'not reviewing fast enough.' The AI-native SDLC fix isn't more AI-generated code — it's embedding AI into every stage where bottlenecks now live.

AI-Native SDLC Playbook L5: CLAUDE.md Turns Team Knowledge into Agent Memory

CLAUDE.md is a context file at the repo root that Claude reads at the start of every session — your team's conventions, commands, architecture patterns, and pitfalls. The course's core advice: if Claude makes the same mistake twice, write it into CLAUDE.md.

AI-Native SDLC Playbook L6: Skills Turn Organizational Standards into Reusable Knowledge

A skill is organizational tacit knowledge made operational — a folder with a SKILL.md that Claude loads automatically when trigger conditions are met. The course's key principle: skills make violations rare; hooks make them nearly impossible.

AI-Native SDLC Playbook L10: AI in the PR Review Loop

Let AI handle the first review pass so humans can focus on intent and risk. This lesson covers how to define REVIEW.md, layer review passes, set up an automated review-comment fix loop, and why the agent that wrote the code must never approve its own PR.

AI-Native SDLC Playbook L11: Hooks as Approval Gates

Hooks are the governance bedrock of the AI-native SDLC — deterministic gates that intercept agent actions and block them if conditions aren't met. This lesson walks from a single production-gate script to full enterprise managed settings covering permission lockdown, sandboxing, credential isolation, and marketplace allowlists. The most technically dense lesson in the entire course.

AI-Native SDLC Playbook L12: CI/CD Integration and Deployment

Plug Claude into the CI/CD pipeline — start with read-only build failure triage, gradually add write operations behind existing gates, expose deployment tooling through MCP, and tier autonomy by environment. The governing principle is one sentence: 'The agent may act up to the production gate and cannot pass it.'

AI-Native SDLC Playbook L14: Series Summary and Adoption Roadmap

After 14 lessons, this final article distills the series into three things: a prioritized adoption roadmap, role-specific reading paths, and Anthropic's complete official documentation list.

Claude Academy: AI-Native SDLC Playbook Course Guide

Anthropic's Claude Academy offers a free 14-lesson course that takes AI-assisted coding from 'individuals using Claude Code' to 'an organization-wide development lifecycle.' Four core concepts — intent.md, CLAUDE.md, Skills, and Hooks — wire together into a complete AI-native SDLC.

Claude Certified Architect Professional (CCAR-P): 28% of It Isn't Technical

CCAR-P is the most expensive and most senior of Anthropic's four exams ($175, 63 items, 120 minutes). Integration is the heaviest domain at 19%, but what really separates it from everything else in this series is the other two: Governance, Safety & Risk Management at 14% and Stakeholder Communication & Lifecycle Management at 14% — 28% combined on compliance, risk, discovery interviews, and delivery lifecycle rather than code. The guide names GDPR, HIPAA, and FedRAMP, and its Intended Audience explicitly excludes entry-level developers and anyone doing 'prompt writing without broader system design responsibility.'