Skip to content
All tags

#rebuttal

2 posts
ai

Writing AI Papers and Submitting to arXiv: A Practical Guide to Structure, Experiments, and Conference Strategy

A consolidated guide drawing on the arXiv official guidelines, the NeurIPS ML Reproducibility Checklist, the REFORMS framework (8 modules, 32 items), and the preprint policies of five top conferences. Covers paper structure, experimental design red lines, the arXiv submission workflow, and a decision framework for conference vs. direct submission.

What Happens to a Top-Conference Paper from Submission to Publication

An AI conference paper passes through anonymized submission, format screening, reviewer bidding and assignment, independent scores from 3-4 reviewers, an author rebuttal, AC/SAC/PC decisions, and camera-ready revision—a process lasting about 4-5 months. ACL-family conferences add ARR's rolling-review model, in which review comes before the author commits the paper to a venue.