Skip to content
All tags

#transfer-learning

5 posts

Transfer Learning (Data): Treating a Generative Model as Data You Can Operate On | MIT 6.7960 Lecture 19

A generative model plus its latent space works as data you can operate on: moving along a latent direction yields counterfactual images, and a handful of manual labels expands into a whole segmentation dataset (one labeled GAN image is worth about 100 ordinary labeled images). But representations trained on generated data still trail real data (42.6% against 43.9% in the numbers cited in class), and rare classes are exactly where generators are least reliable.

Training CNNs and CNN Architectures — Normalization, Initialization, Transfer Learning, and VGG to ResNet | Stanford CS231N Lecture 6

The 2026 slides for CS231N Lecture 6 are titled "Training CNNs and CNN Architectures" and split into how to build and how to train. Only two architectures get case studies. VGG shows that three 3×3 convs are deeper and cheaper than one 7×7. ResNet lets layers learn the residual F(x) = H(x) − x, which fixes an optimization problem where deeper plain nets had worse training error. The most practical takeaway is transfer learning: with fewer than about a million images, start from a model pretrained on a large dataset.

On-Device Training: Gradients Leak Data, and Activations Are the Memory Killer | MIT 6.5940 Lecture 21

There are two reasons to train on the device: the model has to adapt to each user's new data, and that data should not leave the device. Lecture 21 first shows that sharing only gradients is not safe either: Deep Leakage from Gradients recovers the original images and sentences from them. Then it tackles memory. Training costs more than inference because activations must be stored, not because of the parameters. TinyTL fine-tunes only biases plus a lightweight residual and saves 6.5x memory; SparseBP updates only the important layers and channels; QAS lets real int8 training match fp32; and PockEngine does autodiff at compile time, bringing training memory on a 256KB MCU down to 141KB.

Transfer Learning — Pretraining, Feature Extraction, and Fine-Tuning Strategies | MIT 6.7960 Lecture 18

Transfer learning's core insight is 'features learned on big data are good general-purpose representations': freeze the backbone and train only a linear head when downstream data is tiny; full fine-tune when data is plentiful; reach for LoRA / adapter when compute is tight. SimCLR and MAE removed the need for upstream labels and pushed downstream quality another notch.

Separating Pretraining, Transfer Learning, and Fine-Tuning | CMU 07-280 Lecture 15

Lecture 15 splits a pretrained model into representation g and task head h: freeze g and train only the head, or fine-tune some or all parameters at a smaller learning rate depending on data volume and source-target distance.