Reading the whole specification turns up three counter-intuitive things: of the seven mandatory items only three sit on the aircraft and the rest on the ground control station; an unencrypted link still passes, as long as the manual or the box states the reason or the risk — the rule asks for disclosure, not encryption; and the five items that actually test resilience (spoofing, jamming, link loss, known firmware vulnerabilities, app certification) are all in Chapter 8, which is optional.
In 2022 Taiwan's Ministry of Transportation issued a press release titled 'Drone Licensing Overhaul! Obscure Questions Removed, Question Banks Fully Published,' putting all 1,420 questions online — 388 general, 588 professional, 324 renewal, 120 simplified renewal. The stated reason was candid: candidates said it was too hard. And the published bank became a policy document in its own right — the meteorology subject imports the manned-aviation syllabus wholesale, and flight principles lean heavily on fixed-wing aerodynamics, while most candidates fly multirotors.
Taiwan's Civil Aviation Act drone chapter regulates flight safety, not the people being flown over — and that isn't my commentary, it's the Legislative Yuan's own 2020 research report: the chapter 'contains no specific provision on the privacy management that matters most to the public.' So privacy falls back on Article 315-1 of the Criminal Code and the Personal Data Protection Act, and case law shows that catches part of it: pointing a drone at a hot spring room drew an indictment, raising a phone to a window drew four months. What it doesn't catch is evidence — the report's own words: 'by the time the victim notices it, it may already have vanished.'
The three most important lines on a drone spec sheet are exactly the three lines spec sheets don't print. Taiwan's Drone Cybersecurity Testing Specification defines a product 'series' as units whose flight control, communications, and satellite positioning chip modules are all identical — regulation decides whether two drones are the same drone by those three modules, not by looks or endurance. And the weight field isn't a marketing number either: 250 g, 1 kg, 2 kg, 15 kg, and 25 kg are five separate legal thresholds.
The general licence is written-test only and costs NT$450 total (NT$200 test + NT$250 certificate). The professional basic tier adds a practical test and medical exam for NT$1,900. Professional tiers must be climbed in order — reaching the top bracket realistically takes 18 months to two years. Each advanced group (G1/G2/G3) costs another NT$1,200. Fee figures come from Annex 17 of the regulations; the widely circulated 'NT$500 practical test' is wrong.
Register anything 250g or heavier; the registration number expires after 2 years. Individuals only need a licence at 2kg–15kg with navigation equipment. The licence term is now 3 years, not 2, and the student licence age dropped to 14, not 16. This piece covers only the currently effective text of the Remotely Piloted Drone Management Regulations, and flags the three most common outdated claims circulating online.
The EU has had a workable path since the end of 2020 — the Specific category grants an operational authorisation based on risk assessment, with U-space Regulation (EU) 2021/664 rolling out on top. The US Part 108 rule was still at OIRA and unpublished as of July 2026. Taiwan doesn't have the framework at all: its regulations offer 'extended visual line of sight' (900m, 400ft, observer required), while true BVLOS runs on per-activity permits valid for three months.